RESEARCH | CASE STUDY | WISP
Experience Researcher | Lulu Riordan
Contact | theonlyuxlulu@gmail.com
stakeholders | wisp | hellowisp.com
Last updated | 7.19.2021
project brief | wisp
The wisp team is trying to evaluate their cart and checkout experience. They believe that there is a high drop-off due to a confusing experience.
At the same time they are starting to add more offerings but they don’t understand what a good search and browse experience might be with their current offerings, let alone if that experience would need to change with a more diverse set.
research Goals | wisp
To understand and empathize with wisp’s customers — their wants, needs, and feelings — and how they relate to the products and services currently being offered.
+ to gain insights for future offerings
To evaluate the usability of the current experiences on hello wisp . com being offered — search, browse, cart, and checkout — and how they relate to the products and services currently being offered.
+ gain insights that inspire new design directions.
UX review | wisp
After breaking down the project brief and goals, I conducted a light UX review of the current website.
I identified numerous experiences, features a user could interact with and paths a user could take — logged-in or out.
discovery
search (not active)
symptom quiz
browse
cart (not active)
checkout
consult
order tracking
member services
The site has a few offerings but it is not clear if they are independent of each other
physical products
medical services
memberships
There are also various entry points to the brand, products, and services.
with Symptoms
with Diagnosis
for education
These could all be areas and causes of confusion that would be worth exploring for insights into why visitors are leaving before completing what they came to the brand to do.
Research Strategy | wisp
To make a clear, seamless, and accessible e-commerce experience, I would recommend a research strategy that utilizes a mix of sprint style methodologies to address each goal with each experience to uncover why there are drop-offs along the user journey.
The insights gained from an iterative and qualitative study — or activity — help direct the methodology + research questions for the following activity, which ultimately makes a delightful overall experience of the brand.
what would that look like?
depends on the feature and/or goal
with a time cap for this project brief
I’ll focus on a Usability research plan with one main experience
RESEARCH PLAN | BROWSE
Experience Researcher | Lulu Riordan
Contact | theonlyuxlulu@gmail.com
stakeholders | wisp | hellowisp.com
Last updated | 7.19.2021
Goals | product browse
To evaluate the current browsing experience for the physical products and to gain insights that inspire new design directions.
Research Questions | product browse
Can visitors easily find the product(s)?
Can visitors easily navigate between products or conditions?
Do visitors understand the requirements for purchasing a product?(onetime consult vs. membership)
Can visitors understand the type of products offered? (branded vs. unbranded)
Can visitors understand the process for receiving treatment?
What parts of the journey cause confusion?
Methodology | study strategy
A moderated usability study will be conducted remotely (eg. Google Meet, Zoom) with 10 participants. Each participant session will last 60 minutes and will include a short briefing, an interview, a usability walk-through, and a debriefing
5 will be tested with hellowisp. com
5 will be tested on a [competitors site [TBD]
task examples | study Design
Participants will be given — a diagnosis and/or a product to find (eg. Herpes, Acyclovir)
Participants will be given — A symptom and/or a treatment to find (eg. genital itching, cream)
Data collection | records
voice rec
screen rec
Note taking (ideal)
participants | prescreened
10 participants
Age 18 to 26 (under 18 is acceptable with parental consent)
Familiarity with sexual health is not a requisite.
Recruitment: Email invite to current customers or ongoing social media ad based ongoing recruitment efforts
Incentive: $50-$100 gift card
EST Schedule | Ideal
August 13th: Recruiting begins
August 30th: Study begins
September 3rd: Study concludes
September 20th: Report delivery
deliverables | recommendations
In addition to the option of observing the study live, there will be a report and/or Presentation that identifies minor and/or major areas that need improvement, and if applicable — recommendations for fixes and/or or further activities, studies, or design sprints to uncover solutions.